← Case study
Unify informationEnergy and Carbon Auditor · productivity gains

Reducing costs and increasing accuracy for an energy and carbon consultancy

Bills, meter data and fuel-card statements are now ingested once into a single record per client, with gaps and anomalies flagged for an analyst to resolve

image
Return on investment
100Consultant days/year savedEquivalent to roughly £120k of billable capacity.
£30kUpsold from the same dataAdditional deliverables, such as Carbon Reduction Plans, sold from data already collected.

Growth without headcount

Fourteen additional SECR clients and eleven new ESOS engagements taken on in 2026, without adding headcount.
Background

A growing energy and carbon consultancy

Our energy and carbon consulting client is a twelve-person energy and carbon consultancy, working with mid-sized manufacturers, logistics operators and multi-site retailers across the UK. Two of its consultants are registered ESOS Lead Assessors; the rest of the team are energy analysts and carbon accountants. The firm delivers around forty SECR disclosures a year, supports thirty clients through ESOS, and has built a growing carbon strategy practice - SBTi target-setting, net zero roadmaps and Carbon Reduction Plans.

The challenge

Two Lead Assessors spending their time on data, not judgement

With its ESOS pipeline building and its SECR book expanding, the firm was turning work away because its two Lead Assessors were spending most of their time on data rather than judgement. Hiring another Lead Assessor would have taken a year and still left the underlying process unchanged.

01

Data work crowding out judgement

Chasing utility bills, reconciling meter exports against invoices, and rebuilding the same consumption dataset in a fresh spreadsheet for each scheme.

02

The same data, collected twice

A client's SECR data and its ESOS data were collected twice, by different people, in different formats — and the two rarely agreed at the first pass.

03

A fresh spreadsheet for every engagement

Every new engagement meant a new spreadsheet, and every conversion factor update meant checking dozens of them by hand.

04

Hiring wouldn't fix the process

Hiring another Lead Assessor would have taken a year and still left the underlying process unchanged.

Mainspring solution

Starting with SECR, then ESOS, on one platform

[One or two lines introducing the tool — to be completed]

  • One record per clientBills, meter data and fuel-card statements are ingested once into a single record per client, with gaps and anomalies flagged for an analyst to resolve.
  • The SECR view, on versioned factorsFrom that one dataset, Mainspring produces the SECR view — Scope 1 and 2 emissions, intensity ratio, prior-year comparatives — using versioned government conversion factors.
  • Draft until a Lead Assessor signs offDraft narratives and savings opportunities are generated for review, and every figure and paragraph carries a draft label until a named Lead Assessor or director marks it reviewed. Reports are assembled under the client's own branding.
The outcome

From data assembly to review and sign-off

The platform changed both how quickly work gets done and how much of it the practice can take on:

Analyst time per SECR disclosure fell from roughly four days to a day and a half, with the Lead Assessors' involvement focused on review and sign-off rather than data assembly.
Clients already on the platform for SECR arrived at their ESOS assessment with consumption data in place, so the work became a matter of extending a record, not starting again.
The firm took on fourteen additional SECR clients and eleven new ESOS engagements in 2026 without adding headcount, and used the same data to offer Carbon Reduction Plans.
The Lead Assessors describe the biggest change as being able to spend site-visit and review time on the recommendations themselves.
image

Book a free opportunity review.

A focused conversation about how your business runs and where AI could help — and where it would not.

Michael Douglas · Commercial Director