
Streamlined compliance for quicker carbon credit turnarounds
A biochar carbon project developer was proving each production run by hand, reading 155 sensor registers and reassembling the evidence afterwards. Now every run is captured as a structured record and checked against its own history and the methodology it is claimed under, before a credit is ever issued.

Cashflow positve
Reliable compliant data means more regular carbon credit issuance, bringing cash into the business more frequently with less delay.Industrial pyrolysis plants, streaming live telemetry
Our client is a biochar carbon project developer operating industrial pyrolysis plants, converting biomass feedstock such as oil palm trunk and empty fruit bunches into biochar. Each plant streams live PLC data across roughly 155 sensor registers: temperatures, motor currents and speeds, gas and pressure, flow and alarms. Every tonne of biochar they sell as carbon removal has to be proven. Not described, proven, with evidence a registry or verifier will accept.
No structured way to prove a run met MRV requirements
Machine telemetry and business/compliance data lived apart, with no structured way to prove a production run met MRV (Monitoring, Reporting, Verification) requirements.
No single connected record
Nothing connected what feedstock went into a run, how the reactor actually performed, and whether that run qualified for compliance or carbon claims.
155 registers nobody could read
Raw PLC alarm codes and sensor tags were machine identifiers, not language. Turning a run’s telemetry into something a compliance report could use meant someone who knew the plant sitting down with the logs.
QA that wasn't logged
Operator checks during a run were ad hoc rather than recorded, so the quality of the evidence depended on who was on shift.
A wrong figure reaches the registry
With business data siloed from run data, a wrong number could travel all the way into an issued claim before anyone noticed. In carbon removal that is not a correction, it is a reversal, and it costs trust as well as credits.
AI checks the evidence. The claim rests on what survives.
- Every run audited on arrivalAI reads each completed run against the project’s own history: does the mass balance close, does residence time hold through the main phase, is there a telemetry gap where evidence should be. The run arrives with a verdict and a list of what to look at, rather than waiting for someone to find the problem later.
- Checked against the methodology it is claimed underEach run is tested against the thresholds the relevant methodology sets for temperature, residence time and measurement, and the platform states which criteria are met, which are marginal and which fail, with the clause behind each verdict.
- Drift caught across runs, not just within oneA thermocouple reading consistently low, moisture creeping up, a sensor that quietly stopped updating. Invisible in a single run and fatal across a batch of claims, these are surfaced before they reach the registry. The team has already corrected figures this way, including an energy metric, before they travelled onward.
Claims that survive scrutiny, because they were checked first
Machine telemetry, compliance data and feedstock data sit in one connected system, and every run is checked before it becomes a claim:
Want to build something similar for your engineering or manufacturing business?
Tell us about the process or manual check that is slowing you down. We will tell you plainly whether AI is the right answer.
Get in touchMore client work


Automated Feed Monitoring through Image Recognition

Smart data consumption for faster energy reporting

One source of truth for pyrolysis plant operations
Book a free opportunity review.
A focused conversation about how your business runs and where AI could help — and where it would not.





